Bibliometric analysis of DEMATEL method
Abstract
In this study, a bibliometric analysis of the studies evaluated with DEMATEL (Decision Making Experiment and Evaluation Laboratory Method), one of the MCDM methods in Web of Science, was performed according to various performance indicators. The total number of DEMATEL publications examined is 1963 documents. When DEMATEL studies are evaluated in terms of countries, it is seen that China is the leader (553 documents; 28.17%). The most cooperative country is China. The country with the highest h-index is Taiwan (62). Journal of Cleaner Production is the most efficient journal (96; 4.88%). National Chiao Tung University (102, 5.19%) is ranked as the most efficient institution in DEMATEL research. Among the most used words are "Model", "DEMATEL", "Selection", "Management", "fuzzy DEMATEL".
Downloads
References
Abu-Taha, R. (2011). Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis: A literature review. In 2011 Proceedings of PICMET'11: Technology Management in the Energy Smart World (PICMET) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Aytaç, M., & Gürsakal, N. (2015). Karar verme. Dora Basım Yayın Dağıtım AŞ, Bursa.
Blanco-Mesa, F., Merigó, J. M., & Gil-Lafuente, A. M. (2017). “Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review.” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 32(3), 2033-2050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-161640
Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2013). A grey-based DEMATEL model for evaluating business process management critical success factors. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 281-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.07.011
Bragge, J., Korhonen, P., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2010).Bibliometric analysis of multiple criteria decision making/multiattribute utility theory. In Multiple criteria decision making for sustainable energy and transportation systems (pp. 259-268). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04045-0_22
Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). “A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers.”Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000-3011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162
Chang, B., Chang, C. W., & Wu, C. H. (2011). “Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria.” Expert systems with Applications, 38(3), 1850-1858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.114
Chen, F. H., Hsu, T. S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2011). A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 908-932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.02.001
Chowdhury, P., & Paul, S. K. (2020). “Applications of MCDM methods in research on corporate sustainability.”Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.
Çelikbilek, Y.(2018).” Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri”. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık Tic. Ltd. Şti. Ankara.
Çetinkaya Bozkurt, Ö. ve Çetin, A. (2016), “Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi’nin Bibliyometrik Analizi”, Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 11(2), 229-263.
Guerrero-Baena, M. D., Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Fruet Cardozo, J. V. (2014). “Are multi-criteria decision making techniques useful for solving corporate finance problems? A bibliometric analysis.”Revista de Metodos Cuantitativos para la Economia y la Empresa, 17, 60-79.
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). “The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?.” Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
Gul, M., Celik, E., Aydin, N., Gumus, A. T., & Guneri, A. F. (2016). “A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications.” Applied Soft Computing, 46, 60-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.04.040
Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Vafadarnikjoo, A. (2015). Intuitionistic fuzzy based DEMATEL method for developing green practices and performances in a green supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(20), 7207-7220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.030
Hotamışlı, M., & Erem, I. (2014). “Bibliometric analysis of the articles published in journal of accounting and finance.” The Journal of Accounting and Finance, 16(63), 1-19.
Hsu, C. W., Kuo, T. C., Chen, S. H., & Hu, A. H. (2013). “Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management.” Journal of cleaner production, 56, 164-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.012
Huang, C. Y., Shyu, J. Z., & Tzeng, G. H. (2007). Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan's SIP Mall industry. Technovation, 27(12), 744-765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.04.002
Kahraman, C., Onar, S. C., & Oztaysi, B. (2015). “Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: a literature review.” International journal of computational intelligence systems, 8(4), 637-666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2015.1046325
Karaoğlan, S. (2016). “Dematel ve Vikor Yöntemleriyle Dış Kaynak Seçimi: Otel İşletmeciliği Örneği”, Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 55,9-24.
Lawani, S. M (1981). “Bibliometrics: Its Theoretical Foundations, Methods and Applications”, International Journal of Libraries and Information Services, Cilt: 31, 4, 294-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1981.31.1.294
Liao, H., Tang, M., Zhang, X., & Al-Barakati, A. (2019). “Detecting and Visualizing in the Field of Hesitant Fuzzy sets: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2009 to 2018”, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21(5), 128.
Lin, C.L. & Tzeng, G.H. (2009). “A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL”, Expert systems with applications, 36(6), 9683-9697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.040
Lin, C. J., & Wu, W. W. (2008). “A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment.” Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 205-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.012
Lin, R. J. (2013). “Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 32-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.010
Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Liu, N., & Mao, L. X. (2012). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 12926-12934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.031
Liu, W., & Liao, H. (2017). “A bibliometric analysis of fuzzy decision research during 1970–2015.” International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0272-z
Liu, H. C., Chen, X. Q., Duan, C. Y., & Wang, Y. M. (2019). “Failure mode and effect analysis using multi-criteria decision making methods: A systematic literature review.”Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 881-897.
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Nor, K., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., & Valipour, A. (2015). “Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications–a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014.” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28(1), 516-571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1075139
Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). “A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science.”Omega, 73, 37-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004
Morkūnaitė, Ž.,Kalibatas, D., & Kalibatienė, D. (2019). “A Bibliometric Data Analysis of MultiCriteria Decision Making Methods in Heritage. Buildings”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25(2), 76-99.
Osareh, F. (1996). “Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: A review of literatüre.” I. Libri, 46(3), 149-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1996.46.3.149
Peng, X., & Dai, J. (2018). “A Bibliometric Analysis of Neutrosophic Set: Two Decades Review From 1998 to 2017”, Artificial Intelligence Review, 1-57.
Renganath, K., & Suresh, M. (2016, December). “Supplier selection using fuzzy MCDM techniques: A literature review.” In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC) (1-6). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIC.2016.7919590
Seyed-Hosseini, S. M., Safaei, N., & Asgharpour, M. J. (2006). Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(8), 872-881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.09.005
Shgeh, J.,Wu, H. & Huang, K. (2010). “A DEMATEL Method in Identifying Key Success Factors of Hospital Service Quality”, Knowlwdge-Based Systems. 23(3): 277-282.
Shieh, J. I., Wu, H. H., & Huang, K. K. (2010). “A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality.” Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(3), 277-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.01.013
Stevens, R.E. (1953). “Characteristics of Subject Literatures”, Chicago: American College and Research Library Monography Series 7.
Stojčić, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Mardani, A. (2019). “Application of MCDM methods in sustainability engineering: A literature review 2008–2018.” Symmetry, 11(3), 350.
Tramarico, C. L., Salomon, V. A. P., & Marins, F. A. S. (2015). “Analytic hierarchy process and supply chain management: A bibliometric study.”Procedia Computer Science, 55, 441-450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.005
Tsai, W. H., & Chou, W. C. (2009). Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert systems with applications, 36(2), 1444-1458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.058
Tseng, M. L. (2009). A causal and effect decision making model of service quality expectation using grey-fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Expert systems with applications, 36(4), 7738-7748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.011
Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2007). “Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL.” Expert systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004
Yang, J. L., & Tzeng, G. H. (2011). An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1417-1424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.048
Yıldırım, B.F., & Önder, E. (2018). “Operasyonel, Yönetsel ve Stratejik Problemlerin Çözümünde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri”. Dora Basım Yayın Dağıtım AŞ, Bursa.
Yu, D., Wang, W., Zhang, W., & Zhang, S. (2018). “A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Multiple Criteria Decision Making”, Current Science, 114(4), 747-758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i04/747-758
Wu, W. W., & Lee, Y. T. (2007). “Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method.” Expert systems with applications, 32(2), 499-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005
Wu, W. W. (2008). “Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach.” Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828-835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.07.025
Xia, X., Govindan, K., & Zhu, Q. (2015). Analyzing internal barriers for automotive parts remanufacturers in China using grey-DEMATEL approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 811-825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.044
Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Kildienė, S. (2014). “State of Art Surveys of Overviews on MCDM/MADM Methods.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(1), 165- 179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.892037
Zhou, Q., Huang, W., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Identifying critical success factors in emergency management using a fuzzy DEMATEL method. Safety science, 49(2), 243-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.08.005
Zyoud, S. H., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2017). “A Bibliometric-Based Survey on AHP and TOPSIS Techniques”, Expert Systems with Applications, 78, 158-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.016
