How vulnerable are high-income countries to the covid-19 pandemic? An MCDM approach

  • Sevgi Eda Tuzcu Ankara University, Faculty of Political Sciences, Department of Business Administration, Ankara, Turkey
  • Serap Pelin Türkoğlu Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Şereflikoçhisar Berat Cömertoğlu Vocational School, Department of Management and Organization, Ankara, Turkey
Keywords: High–Income Countries, MCDM, Entropy Method, PIV Method, Covid-19 Pandemic.


This paper tries to determine the most vulnerable points of high–income countries during the Covid-19 pandemic in an MCDM setting. For this aim, we use the entropy method to obtain criteria weights and the PIV method for the comparisons. We employ a wide range of criteria that account for political, demographic, capacity, and Covid-19 indicators including vaccination. Our sample consists of 40 HICs. The results reveal that countries with less equitable healthcare systems and with more vaccine hesitancy are more vulnerable to Covid-19. Hospital bed capacity, a strict government policy, and a lower percentage of the population who smoke add to the success of countries in this combat. We compare our findings with SAW and MAUT techniques as well and obtain very similar rankings. Therefore, we conclude that the PIV method can be used for national performance evaluations with a reduced rank reversal problem and computational simplicity.


Download data is not yet available.


Afshari, A., Mojahed, M., & Yusuff, R. M. (2010). Simple additive weighting approach to personnel selection problem. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(5), 511-515.

Alkan, N., & Kahraman, C. (2021). Evaluation of government strategies against COVID-19 pandemic using q-rung orthopair fuzzy TOPSIS method. Applied Soft Computing, 110, 107653.

Arsu, T. (2021). Ülkelerin Covid-19 Pandemisine karşı mücadelesinin çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ile değerlendirilmesi. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Akademik İzdüşüm Dergisi, 6(1), 128-140.

Aw, J., Benjamin Seng, J. J., Ying Seah, S. S., & Low, L. L. COVID-19 Vaccine hesitancy—A scoping review of literature in high-income countries. Vaccines 2021, 9, 900.

Aydin, N., & Yurdakul, G. (2020). Assessing countries’ performances against COVID-19 via WSIDEA and machine learning algorithms. Applied Soft Computing, 97, 106792.

Baydaş, M., & Elma, O. E. (2021). An objectıve criteria proposal for the comparison of MCDM and weighting methods in financial performance measurement: An application in Borsa Istanbul. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(2), 257-279. DOI:

Cartaxo, A. N. S., Barbosa, F. I. C., de Souza Bermejo, P. H., Moreira, M. F., & Prata, D. N. (2021). The exposure risk to COVID-19 in most affected countries: A vulnerability assessment model. PloS one, 16(3), e0248075.

Chen, Y. T. (2021). The effect of vaccination rates on the infection of COVID-19 under the vaccination rate below the herd immunity threshold. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7491.

Chodha, V., Dubey, R., Kumar, R., Singh, S., & Kaur, S. (2022). Selection of industrial arc welding robot with TOPSIS and Entropy MCDM techniques. Materials Today: Proceedings, 50, 709-715.

Çalış Boyacı, A. (2021). Which OECD Countries Are Advantageous in Fight Against COVID-19?. Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 37(1), 137-148.

Çınar, Y., Gürsel, G., & Tuzcu, S. E. (2018). The Impacts of Diversification Strategies of Turkish Banks on Their Profitability and Risk: A Panel Data Analysis. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 73(4), 1141-1168.

Dashore, K., Pawar, S. S., Sohani, N., & Verma, D. S. (2013). Product evaluation using entropy and multi criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Engineering Trend and Technology (IJETT), 4(5), 2183-2187.

De Nardo, P., Gentilotti, E., Mazzaferri, F., Cremonini, E., Hansen, P., Goossens, H., & Tacconelli, E. (2020). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to prioritize hospital admission of patients affected by Covid-19 in low-resource settings with hospital-bed shortage. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 98, 494–500.

Emovon, I., & Samuel, O. D. (2017). Prioritising alternative solutions to power generation problems using MCDM techniques: Nigeria as case study. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 9(3), 11-17.

Fisher, D., Teo, Y. Y., & Nabarro, D. (2020). Assessing national performance in response to COVID-19. The Lancet, 396(10252), 653-655.

George, B., Verschuere, B., Wayenberg, E., & Zaki, B. L. (2020). A guide to benchmarking COVID‐19 performance data. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 696-700.

Gordon, D. V., Grafton, R. Q., & Steinshamn, S. I. (2021). Cross-country effects and policy responses to COVID-19 in 2020: The Nordic countries. Economic Analysis and Policy, 71, 198-210.

Goswami, S. S., Mohanty, S. K., & Behera, D. K. (2021). Selection of a green renewable energy source in India with the help of MEREC integrated PIV MCDM tool. Materials Today: Proceedings, 52 (2022), 1153-1160.

Gupta, R., & Kumar, S. (2022). Intuitionistic fuzzy scale-invariant entropy with correlation coefficients-based VIKOR approach for multi-criteria decision-making. Granular Computing, 7(1), 77-93.

Hodgins, S., & Saad, A. (2020). Will the higher-income country blueprint for COVID-19 work in low-and lower middle-income countries?. Global Health: Science and Practice, 8(2), 136-143.

Irwin, A. What It Will Take to Vaccinate the World Against COVID-19. 2021. Available online: d41586-021-00727-3/ Accessed 21 February 2022.

Işık, A. T., & Adalı, E. A. (2017). The decision-making approach based on the combination of entropy and ROV methods for the apple selection problem. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(3), 80-86.

Jamison, D. T., Lau, L. J., Wu, K. B., & Xiong, Y. (2020). Country performance against COVID-19: rankings for 35 countries. BMJ global health, 5(12), e003047.

Kannan, D., & Thiyagarajan, R. (2022). Entropy based TOPSIS method for controller selection in software defined networking. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 34(1), e6499.

Kayapinar Kaya, S. (2020). Evaluation of the Effect of COVID-19 on Countries’ Sustainable Development Level: A comparative MCDM framework. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(3), 101-122. DOI:

Khan, F., Ali, Y., & Pamucar, D. (2021). A new fuzzy FUCOM-QFD approach for evaluating strategies to enhance the resilience of the healthcare sector to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Kybernetes. DOI:

Khan, N. Z., Ansari, T. S. A., Siddiquee, A. N., & Khan, Z. A. (2019). Selection of E-learning websites using a novel Proximity Indexed Value (PIV) MCDM method. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(2), 241-256.

Kim, S. K., & Song, O. (2009). A MAUT approach for selecting a dismantling scenario for the thermal column in KRR-1. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 36(2), 145-150. DOI:

Markowicz, I., & Rudawska, I. (2021). Struggling with COVID-19—A Framework for Assessing Health System Performance. Sustainability, 13(20), 11146.

Marti, L., & Puertas, R. (2021). European countries’ vulnerability to COVID-19: Multicriteria decision-making techniques. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1-12.

Mufazzal, S., & Muzakkir, S. M. (2018). A new multi-criterion decision-making (MCDM) method based on proximity indexed value for minimizing rank reversals. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 119, 427–438. DOI:

Mukhametzyanov, I. (2021). Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: Entropy, CRITIC and SD. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(2), 76-105. DOI:

Nguyen, P. H., Tsai, J. F., Dang, T. T., Lin, M. H., Pham, H. A., & Nguyen, K. A. (2021). A hybrid spherical fuzzy MCDM approach to prioritize governmental intervention strategies against the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study from Vietnam. Mathematics, 9(20), 1-26.

Pal, R., Sekh, A. A., Kar, S., & Prasad, D. K. (2020). Neural network based country wise risk prediction of COVID-19. Applied Sciences, 10(18), 6448.

Samanlioglu, F., & Kaya, B. E. (2020). Evaluation of the COVID-19 pandemic intervention strategies with hesitant F-AHP. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2020.

Silver A. (2022). Covid-19: China’s president orders Hong Kong to control outbreak. BMJ, 376.

Trung, D. D. (2021). Application of TOPSIS and PIV methods for multi-criteria decision making in hard turning process. Journal of Machine Engineering, 21(4), 57–71.

Türkoğlu, S. P., & Tuzcu, S. E. (2021). Assessing country performances during the COVID-19 pandemic: a standard deviation based range of value method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 4(3), 59-81. DOI:

Wildman, J. (2021). COVID-19 and income inequality in OECD countries. The European Journal of Health Economics, 22(3), 455-462.

Wilson, S. (2020). Pandemic leadership: Lessons from New Zealand’s approach to COVID-19. Leadership, 16(3), 279-293.

Yiğit, A. (2020). The Performance of OECD Countries in Combating with Covid 19 Pandemics: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 10(10), 399-416.

Zamiela, C., Hossain, N. U. I., & Jaradat, R. (2021). Enablers of resilience in the healthcare supply chain: A case study of US healthcare industry during Covid-19 pandemic. Research in Transportation Economics, 101174, 1-16.

Žižović, M., Miljković, B., & Marinković, D. (2020). Objective methods for determining criteria weight coefficients: A modification of the CRITIC method. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(2), 149-161. DOI:

Žižović, M., Pamucar, D., Miljković, B., & Karan, A. (2021). Multiple-criteria evaluation model for medical professionals assigned to temporary SARS-CoV-2 hospitals. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(1), 153-173. DOI:

How to Cite
Tuzcu, S. E., & Türkoğlu, S. P. (2022). How vulnerable are high-income countries to the covid-19 pandemic? An MCDM approach. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 5(2), 372-395.