An integrated IRN-BWM-EDAS method for supplier selection in a textile industry

  • Vivek Kumar Paul Department of Production Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
  • Santonab Chakraborty National Institute of Industrial Engineering, Mumbai, India
  • Shankar Chakraborty Department of Production Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Keywords: Supplier selection, textile industry, rough numbers, BWM, EDAS, MCDM, ranking


Like all other manufacturing industries, supplier selection also plays a pivotal role in a textile industry with respect to timely and cost-effective delivery of raw materials (cotton, yarn or fabric), chemicals and dyes, machineries, spare parts and other auxiliary parts/items. An appropriately selected supplier would help the textile industry in seamless production of final or semi-finished products leading to effective deployment of supply chain management concept. Due to involvement of many competing suppliers and a set of conflicting criteria, supplier selection is often treated as a typical    multi-criteria decision making problem. The process of choosing the right supplier for a given item often becomes more difficult due to presence of both quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria. In this paper, based on six most significant criteria, an attempt is put forward to integrate interval rough number (IRN) with best worst method (BWM) and evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method to solve a supplier selection problem for a textile industry. The application of IRN helps in expressing opinions of the decision makers with respect to relative importance of the considered criteria and performance of the suppliers against each of the criteria using rough boundary intervals under group decision making environment. Later, the criteria weights are determined using IRN-BWM and the alternative suppliers are ranked from the best to the worst employing IRN-EDAS method. An IRN Dombi weighted geometric averaging (IRNDWGA) technique is considered to aggregate the opinions of the decision makers. This integrated approach identifies alternative 3 as the most apposite supplier for the textile industry under consideration. 


Download data is not yet available.


Acar, A.Z., Önden, İ., & Gürel, Ö. (2016). Evaluation of the parameters of the green supplier selection decision in textile industry. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 24(5), 8-14. DOI:

Ali, S.M., Burney, S.M.A., & Khan, S.Y. (2020). Fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS: An integrated multi-criteria decision support system for supplier selection in Pakistan’s textile industry. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 20(4), 91-99.

Amindoust, A., & Saghafinia, A. (2016). Textile supplier selection in sustainable supply chain using a modular fuzzy inference system model. Journal of the Textile Institute, 108(7), 1250-1258. DOI:

Ayvaz, B., & Kuşakcı, A.O. (2017). A trapezoidal type-2 fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method based on TOPSIS for supplier selection. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 23(1), 71-80. DOI:

Badi, I., & Ballem, M. (2018). Supplier selection using the rough BWM-MAIRCA model: A case study in pharmaceutical supplying in Libya. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(2), 16-33. DOI:

Bakhat, R., & Rajaa, M. (2019). Developing a novel grey integrated multi-criteria approach for enhancing the supplier selection procedure: A real-world case of textile company. Decision Science Letters, 8, 211-224.

Burney, S.M.A., & Ali, S.M. (2019). Fuzzy multi-criteria based decision support system for supplier selection in textile industry. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 19(1), 239-244.

Celik, E., Yucesan, M., & Gul, M. (2021). Green supplier selection for textile industry: a case study using BWM-TODIM integration under interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 64793-64817.

Chakraborty, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2022). A scoping review on the applications of MCDM techniques for parametric optimization of machining processes. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 29, 4165-4186.

Chakraborty, S., Chatterjee, P., & Das, P.P. (2023). Multi-criteria Decision Making in Manufacturing Environment: Models and Applications. CRC Press, India.

Chatterjee, P., Banerjee, A., Mondal, S., Boral, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2018). Development of a hybrid meta-model for material selection using design of experiments and EDAS method. Engineering Transactions, 66(2), 187-207.

Chattopadhyay, R., Das, P.P., & Chakraborty, S. (2022). Development of a rough-MABAC-DoE-based metamodel for supplier selection in an iron and steel industry. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 5(1), 20-40. DOI:

Dhanalakshmi, C.S., Madhu, P., Karthick, A., Mathew, M., & Kumar, R.V. (2022). A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS and EDAS as an auxiliary tool for pyrolysis material selection and its application. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery,

El-Araby, A., Sabry, I., & El-Assal, A. (2022). A comparative study of using MCDM methods integrated with entropy weight method for evaluating facility location. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 5(1), 121-138. DOI:

Ersoy, Y., & Dogan, N.Ö. (2020). An integrated model of fuzzy AHP/Fuzzy DEA for measurement of supplier performance: A case study in textile sector. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 7(1), 17-38.

Ghosh, S., Chakraborty, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2022). An integrated IRN SWARA MABAC based approach for evaluation of tourism websites of the Indian states. OPSEARCH,

Ghorabaee, M.K., Zavadskas, E.K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435-451. DOI:

Ghorabaee, M.K., Zavadskas, E.K., Amiri, M., & Turskis, Z. (2016). Extended EDAS method for fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: an application to supplier selection. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 11(3), 358-371. DOI:

Guarnieria, P., & Trojan, F. (2019). Decision making on supplier selection based on social, ethical, and environmental criteria: A study in the textile industry. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 141, 347-361.

Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2017). Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 121, 23-31. DOI:

Hasan, M.G., Ashraf, Z., & Khan M.F. (2022). Multi-choice best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37, 1129-1156.

Hlyal, M., Chahid, M.T., Soulhi, A., Alami, J., & Alami, N. (2015). Supplier’s selection for the Moroccan textile sector by using performance measurement system. Modern Applied Science, 9(3), 102-116. DOI:

Jing, S.L. (2018). Supplier selection ranking using MCDM approach in the textile industries. International Journal of Applied Optimization Studies, 1(1), 25-38.

Kara, K., & Koleoglu, N., & Gürol, P. (2016). Analytic network process (ANP) in supplier selection: A case study in textile sector. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 7(5), 241-257.

Karami, S., Yaghin, R.G., & Mousazadegan, F. (2020). Supplier selection and evaluation in the garment supply chain: an integrated DEA-PCA-VIKOR approach. Journal of the Textile Institute, 112(4), 578-595.

Khan, S.A., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Ahmadi, H.B., & Oyedijo, A. (2021). A best-worst-method-based performance evaluation framework for manufacturing industry. Kybernetes, DOI: 10.1108/K-03-2021-0202. DOI:

Kundakcı, N. (2019). An integrated method using MACBETH and EDAS methods for evaluating steam boiler alternatives. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 26, 27-34.

Manucharyan, H. (2021). Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection: A literature critique. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12(1), 329-352.

Mitra, A. (2021). Gradation of raw jute fibres using evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method. Journal of Institution of Engineers: Series E, 102(1), 25-32.

Mitra, A. (2022). Selection of cotton fabrics using EDAS method. Journal of Natural Fibers,

Mondragon, A.E.C., Mastrocinque, E., Tsai, J-F., & Hogg, P.J. (2021). An AHP and fuzzy AHP multifactor decision making approach for technology and supplier selection in the high-functionality textile industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(4), 1112-1124.

Mou, Q., Xu, Z., & Liao, H. (2016). An intuitionistic fuzzy multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria group decision making. Information Sciences, 374, 224-239. DOI:

Nong, N-M.T.G., & Ho, P.T. (2019). Criteria for supplier selection in textile and apparel industry: A case study in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(2), 213-221.

Okponyia, K.O., & Oke, S.A. (2021). Novel EDAS-Taguchi and EDAS-Taguchi-Pareto methods for wire EDM process parametric selection of Ni55.8Ti (Nitinol) shape memory alloy. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 3(2), 105-122.

Pamučar, D., Mihajlović, M., Obradović, R., & Atanasković, P. (2017). Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers: Hybrid DEMATEL-ANP-MAIRCA model. Expert Systems with Applications, 88, 58-80. DOI:

Pamučar, D., Petrović, I., & Ćirović, G. (2018). Modification of the best-worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 91, 89-106. DOI:

Pamučar, D., Ecer, F., Cirovic, G., & Arlasheedi, M.A. (2020). Application of improved best worst method (BWM) in real-world problems. Mathematics, 8, 1342.

Rashid, T., Ali, A., & Chu, Y-M. (2021). Hybrid BW-EDAS MCDM methodology for optimal industrial robot selection. PLoS One, 16(2), e0246738.

Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49-57. DOI:

Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, P., Guerrero-Baena, M.D., Luque-Vílchez, M., & Castilla-Polo, F. (2021). An approach to using the best-worst method for supporting sustainability reporting decision-making in SMEs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(14), 2618-2640.

Sadjadi, S.J. & Karimi, M. (2018). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: A robust approach. Decision Science Letters, 7, 323-340. DOI:

Sarıçam, C., & Yilmaz, S.M. (2021). An integrated framework for supplier selection and performance evaluation for apparel retail industry. Textile Research Journal,

Sasi, J.C., & Digalwar, A.K. (2015). Application of AHP and TOPSIS method for supplier selection between India & China in textile industry. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(4), 1730-1738.

Shukla, M.K. (2016). Supplier evaluation and selection criteria in business performance of small and medium scale enterprise. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(6), 70-76.

Srdjevic, B., Srdjevic, Z., Reynolds, K.M., Lakicevic, M., & Zdero, S. (2022). Using analytic hierarchy process and best-worst method in group evaluation of urban park quality. Forests, 13, 290.

Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E.K., Ghorabaee, M.K., & Turskis, Z. (2017). An extension of the EDAS method based on the use of interval grey numbers. Studies in Informatics and Control, 26(1), 5-12. DOI:

Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Zavadskas, E.K., Ćirović, G., & Prentkovskis, O. (2017a). The selection of wagons for the internal transport of a logistics company: A novel approach based on rough BWM and rough SAW methods. Symmetry, 9(11), 264. DOI:

Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Vasiljević, M., Stojić, G., & Korica, S. (2017b). Novel integrated multi-criteria model for supplier selection: Case study construction company. Symmetry, 9(11), 279. DOI:

Tayyab, M., & Sarkar, B. (2021). An interactive fuzzy programming approach for a sustainable supplier selection under textile supply chain management. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 155, 107164.

Ulutaş, A. (2017). Sewing machine selection for a textile workshop by using EDAS method. Journal of Business Research, 9(2), 169-183. DOI:

Utama, D.M., Asrofi, M.S., & Amallynda, I. (2021a). Integration of AHP-MOORA algorithm in green supplier selection in the Indonesian textile industry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1933, 012058.

Utama, D.M., Maharani, B., & Amallynda, I. (2021b). Integration Dematel and ANP for the supplier selection in the textile industry: A case study. JURNAL ILMIAH TEKNIK INDUSTRI, 20(1), 119-130.

Wang, C-N., Viet, V.T.H., Ho, T.P., Nguyen, V.T., & Nguyen, V.T. (2020). Multi-criteria decision model for the selection of suppliers in the textile industry. Symmetry, 12, 979.

Yang, Q., Zhang, Z., You, X., & Chen, T. (2016). Evaluation and classification of overseas talents in China based on the BWM for intuitionistic relations. Symmetry, 8(11), 137. DOI:

Yanmaz, O., Turgut, Y., Can, E.N., & Kahraman, C. (2020). Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy EDAS method: an application to car selection problem. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 38(4), 4061-4077.

Yazdani, M., Chatterjee P., Pamucar, D., Chakraborty, S. (2020). Development of an integrated decision making model for location selection of logistics centers in the Spanish autonomous communities. Expert Systems with Applications, 148, 113208.

Yıldız, A., & Yayla, A.Y. (2015). Multi-criteria decision-making methods for supplier selection: A literature review. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 26(2), 158-177. DOI:

You, X., Chen, T., & Yang, Q. (2016). Approach to multi-criteria group decision-making problems based on the best-worst-method and electre method. Symmetry, 8(9), 95. DOI:

Zhang, S., Wei, G., Gao, H., Wei, C., & Wei, Y. (2019). EDAS method for multiple criteria group decision making with picture fuzzy information and its application to green suppliers selections. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(6), 1123-1138.

How to Cite
Paul, V. K., Chakraborty, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2022). An integrated IRN-BWM-EDAS method for supplier selection in a textile industry. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 5(2), 219-240.